Comments on: " Should we allow animated banners in the portal?
"
4
Jun 16
3:37
J. Fischer said: If we allow animation this will lead to an arms race: I have already animation with sound on Yahoo, elsewhere you can appreciate pop ups, pop under, inline ads and kiosk pop up where even the task bar is hidden. And there is worse.
Tastefully I think is a requirement for the static banners also, and for them the adjective should be "non-invasive" not only "not irritating".
3
Jun 14
1:10
jdnuf said: I think they should be allowed if they are tastefully done. If the consesus of the members is that the banner lacks quality (or is down right irritating), then it should be rejected.
2
Jun 13
2:42
Norbert said: Animation is a technical feature of the picture format. There are uses where animation is fine, but just a fast flashing attention grabber is a bad idea: I urge avoid it.
I agree that we should limit filesize for member banners, this is independent whether the banner uses animation or not.
1
Jun 12
4:33
ahecq said: We could allow animation if we limit both filesize and animation speed.
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for the content.
This site was made with WebAPP Web Automated Perl Portal systemv0.9.9.9 RC4 , a web portal system written in Perl.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster.